Cisco 300-135 ExamTSHOOT Troubleshooting and Maintaining Cisco IP Networks

Total Question: 201 Last Updated: Jun 13,2019
  • Updated 300-135 Dumps
  • Based on Real 300-135 Exams Scenarios
  • Free 300-135 pdf Demo Available
  • Check out our 300-135 Dumps in a new PDF format
  • Instant 300-135 download
  • Guarantee 300-135 success in first attempt
Package Select:

Questions & Answers PDF

Practice Test Software

Practice Test + PDF 30% Discount

Price: $65.95 $29.99

Buy Now Free Trial

The Only Tip You Need: ccnp 300 135

We provide real 300 135 tshoot exam questions and answers braindumps in two formats. Download PDF & Practice Tests. Pass Cisco tshoot 300 135 pdf Exam quickly & easily. The 300 135 tshoot PDF type is available for reading and printing. You can print more and practice many times. With the help of our Cisco ccnp tshoot 300 135 pdf dumps pdf and vce product and material, you can easily pass the cisco 300 135 exam.

Q31. - (Topic 4) 

Scenario: 

You have been asked by your customer to help resolve issues in their routed network. Their network engineer has deployed HSRP. On closer inspection HSRP doesn't appear to be operating properly and it appears there are other network problems as well. You are to provide solutions to all the network problems. 

You have received notification from network monitoring system that link between R1 and R5 is down and you noticed that the active router for HSRP group 1 has not failed over to the standby router for group 1. You are required to troubleshoot and identify the issue. 

A. There is an HSRP group track command misconfiguration 

B. There is an HSRP group priority misconfiguration 

C. There is an HSRP authentication misconfiguration 

D. There is an HSRP group number mismatch 

E. This is not an HSRP issue; this is routing issue. 

Answer:

Explanation: 

When looking at the HSRP configuration of R1, we see that tracking has been enabled, but that it is not tracking the link to R5, only the link to R2: 

R1 should be tracking the Eth 0/1 link, not 0/0 to achieve the desired affect/ 


Q32. - (Topic 6) 

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a ‘proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, and FHRP services, a trouble ticket has been operated indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. 

Use the supported commands to Isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions. 

On which device is the fault condition located? 

A. R1 

B. R2 

C. R3 

D. R4 

E. DSW1 

F. DSW2 

G. ASW1 

H. ASW2 

Answer:

Explanation: 

Since the Clients are getting an APIPA we know that DHCP is not working. However, upon closer examination of the ASW1 configuration we can see that the problem is not with DHCP, but the fact that the trunks on the port channels are only allowing VLANs 1-9, when the clients belong to VLAN 10. VLAN 10 is not traversing the trunk on ASW1, so the problem is with the trunk configuration on ASW1. 


Q33. - (Topic 21) 

The implementation group has been using the test bed to do an IPv6 'proof-of-concept1. After several changes to the network addressing and routing schemes, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that the loopback address on R1 (2026::111:1) is not able to ping the loopback address on DSW2 (2026::102:1).

Use the supported commands to isolate the cause of this fault and answer the following question.

What is the solution to the fault condition?

A. Under the interface Tunnel34 configuration delete the tunnel mode ipv6 command.

B. Under the interface Serial0/0/0.34 configuration enter the ipv6 address 2026::34:1/122 command.

C. Under the interface Tunnel34 configuration enter the ip address unnumbered Serial0/0/0.34 command.

D. Under the interface Tunnel34 configuration delete the tunnel source Serial0/0/0.34 command and enter the tunnel source 2026::34:1/122 command.

Answer: A

Explanation:

As explained earlier, the problem is with route misconfigured tunnel modes on R3. R3 is using tunnel mode ipv6, while R4 is using the default of GRE. We need to remove the "tunnel mode ipv6" command under interface Tunnel34


Q34. - (Topic 17) 

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a ‘proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing schemes, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened DSW1 will not become the active router for HSRP group 10. 

Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions. 

What is the solution to the fault condition? 

A. Under the interface vlan 10 configuration enter standby 10 preempt command. 

B. Under the track 1 object configuration delete the threshold metric up 1 down 2 command and enter the threshold metric up 61 down 62 command. 

C. Under the track 10 object configuration delete the threshold metric up 61 down 62 command and enter the threshold metric up 1 down 2 command. 

D. Under the interface vlan 10 configuration delete the standby 10 track1 decrement 60 command and enter the standby 10 track 10 decrement 60 command. 

Answer:

Explanation: 

On DSW1, related to HSRP, under VLAN 10 change the given track 1 command to instead use the track 10 command. 


Q35. - (Topic 12) 

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a ‘proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 

address. 

Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions. 

On which device is the fault condition located? 

A. R1 

B. R2 

C. R3 

D. R4 

E. DSW1 

F. DSW2 

G. ASW1 

H. ASW2 

Answer:

Explanation: 

port security needs is configured on ASW1. 


Q36. - (Topic 13) 

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a ‘proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. 

Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions. 

Which is the solution to the fault condition? 

A. Under the EIGRP process, delete the redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF_ to_ EIGRP command and enter the redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF - > EIGRP command. 

B. Under the EIGRP process, delete the redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF_ to_ EIGRP command and enter the redistribute ospf 6 metric route-map OSPF - > EIGRP command. 

C. Under the OSPF process, delete the redistribute eigrp10 subnets route-map EIGPR ->OSPF command and enter the redistribute eigrp10 subnets route-map OSPF - > EIGRP command. 

D. Under the OSPF process, delete the redistribute eigrp10 subnets route-map EIGPR ->OSPF command and enter the redistribute eigrp10 subnets route-map EIGPR - > OSPF command. 

E. Under the EIGRP process, delete the redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF _to_ EIGRP command and enter redistribute ospf 1 metric 100000 100 100 1 15000 route_ map OSPF _to _EIGRP command 

Answer:

Explanation: 

On R4, in the redistribution of EIGRP routing protocol, we need to change name of route-map to resolve the issue. It references route-map OSPF_to_EIGRP but the actual route map is called OSPF->EIGRP. 

Topic 14, Ticket 9 : EIGRP AS number 

Topology Overview (Actual Troubleshooting lab design is for below network design) 

. Client Should have IP 10.2.1.3 

. EIGRP 100 is running between switch DSW1 & DSW2 

. OSPF (Process ID 1) is running between R1, R2, R3, R4 

. Network of OSPF is redistributed in EIGRP 

. BGP 65001 is configured on R1 with Webserver cloud AS 65002 

. HSRP is running between DSW1 & DSW2 Switches 

The company has created the test bed shown in the layer 2 and layer 3 topology exhibits. 

This network consists of four routers, two layer 3 switches and two layer 2 switches. 

In the IPv4 layer 3 topology, R1, R2, R3, and R4 are running OSPF with an OSPF process number 1. 

DSW1, DSW2 and R4 are running EIGRP with an AS of 10. Redistribution is enabled where necessary. 

R1 is running a BGP AS with a number of 65001. This AS has an eBGP connection to AS 65002 in the ISP's network. Because the company's address space is in the private range. 

R1 is also providing NAT translations between the inside (10.1.0.0/16 & 10.2.0.0/16) networks and outside (209.65.0.0/24) network. 

ASW1 and ASW2 are layer 2 switches. 

NTP is enabled on all devices with 209.65.200.226 serving as the master clock source. 

The client workstations receive their IP address and default gateway via R4's DHCP server. 

The default gateway address of 10.2.1.254 is the IP address of HSRP group 10 which is running on DSW1 and DSW2. 

In the IPv6 layer 3 topology R1, R2, and R3 are running OSPFv3 with an OSPF process number 6. 

DSW1, DSW2 and R4 are running RIPng process name RIP_ZONE. 

The two IPv6 routing domains, OSPF 6 and RIPng are connected via GRE tunnel running over the underlying IPv4 OSPF domain. Redistrution is enabled where necessary. 

Recently the implementation group has been using the test bed to do a ‘proof-of-concept' on several implementations. This involved changing the configuration on one or more of the devices. You will be presented with a series of trouble tickets related to issues introduced during these configurations. 

Note: Although trouble tickets have many similar fault indications, each ticket has its own issue and solution. 

Each ticket has 3 sub questions that need to be answered & topology remains same. 

Question-1 Fault is found on which device, 

Question-2 Fault condition is related to, 

Question-3 What exact problem is seen & what needs to be done for solution 

Client is unable to ping IP 209.65.200.241 

Solution 

Steps need to follow as below:-

. When we check on client 1 & Client 2 desktop we are not receiving DHCP address from R4 

ipconfig ----- Client will be receiving IP address 10.2.1.3 

. From Client PC we can ping 10.2.1.254 

. But IP 10.2.1.3 is not able to ping from R4, R3, R2, R1 . 

. This clearly shows problem at R4 Kindly check routes in EIGRP there are no routes of eigrp. 

. Check the neighborship of EIGRP on R4; there are no neighbor seen from DSW1 & DSW2 check the running config of EIGRP protocol it shows EIGRP AS 1 process…. Now check on DSW1 & DSW2 

On DSW1 only one Eigrp neighbour is there with DSW2 but its not with R4… 

. From above snapshot & since R4 has EIGRP AS number 1 due to which neighbour is not happening. 

. Change required: On R4, IPV4 EIGRP Routing, need to change the EIGRP AS number from 1 to 10 since DSW1 & DSW2 is configured to be in EIGRP AS number 10. 


Q37. - (Topic 16) 

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a ‘proof-of-concept'. After several changes to the network addressing, routing schemes, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that the loopback address on R1 (2026::111:1) is not able to ping the loopback address on DSW2(2026::102:1). 

Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions. 

What is the solution to fault condition? 

A. Under the interface Serial 0/0/0.23 configuration enter the ipv6 ospf 6 area 0 command. 

B. Under the interface Serial0/0/0.12 configuration enter the ipv6 ospf 6 area 12 command. 

C. Under ipv6 router ospf 6 configuration enter the network 2026::1:/122 area 0 command. 

D. Under ipv6 router ospf 6 configuration enter no passive-interface default command. 

Answer:

Explanation: 

On R2, IPV6 OSPF routing, configuration is required to add ipv6 ospf 6 area 0 under interface serial 0/0/0.23 


Q38. - (Topic 12) 

The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a ‘proof-of-concept' that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241. After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services, NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241 address. 

Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the following questions. 

What is the solution to the fault condition? 

A. In Configuration mode, using the interface range Fa 1/0/1 – 2, then no switchport port-security interface configuration commands. Then in exec mode clear errdisable interface fa 1/01 – 2 vlan 10 command 

B. In Configuration mode, using the interface range Fa 1/0/1 – 2, then no switchport port-security, followed by shutdown, no shutdown interface configuration commands. 

C. In Configuration mode, using the interface range Fa 1/0/1 – 2, then no switchport port-security interface configuration commands. 

D. In Configuration mode, using the interface range Fa 1/0/1 – 2, then no switchport port-security interface configuration commands. Then in exec mode clear errdisable interface fa 1/0/1, then clear errdisable interface fa 1/0/2 commands. 

Answer:

Explanation: 

On ASW1, we need to remove port-security under interface fa1/0/1 & fa1/0/2. 

Reference: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/ABC389/ABC621/technologies_tech_note09186a00806c d87b.shtml 


Related 300-135 Articles